| Editor's Note: The following article is reprinted from the newsletter
of the local chapter of the International Plastic Modeler's Society (IPMS),
which I also edit. As part of our effort to accurately model the subjects
of our interest, we learn a great deal of their history. Some of the folks
who learn that history are good enough to share it with the rest of us.
As fellow aviation enthusiasts, I hope you find this interesting. If you
like it, I can get more! - Jim Bower
Japan entered the Second World War with the best torpedo bomber of any
nation, the B5N 2 Kate. Their dive-bomber, the
D3A 1 Val, while somewhat outmoded by wartime developments, was a very
stable platform for dive-bombing and in the hands of a capable pilot, achieved
remarkable results. Both of these aircraft were the result of late 1930’s
efforts to modernize carrier attack planes. Of course, the Zero fighter
is well known among aviation buffs and the general public, but little is
printed about the aircraft that delivered the initial punch in the Pacific
war or the planes that replaced them later in the war.
The Kate was developed from a 1937 design for an all-metal low wing
monoplane to deliver torpedoes against enemy shipping. The version that
entered the Pacific war was the –2. It had a top speed of over 200 mph,
vastly superior to America’s TBD 1 Devastator of which it was a contemporary.
144 of the aircraft flew from the Kido Butai to cripple the U.S. Pacific
Fleet
at Pearl Harbor and they delivered fatal hits to the U.S. carriers
Lexington, Yorktown and Hornet at Coral Sea, Midway and Santa Cruz. The
B5N had a clean configuration with a completely retractable undercarriage
and an enormous wing which folded allowing a relatively small carrier stowage
signature. The Kate was quite successful in the first two years of the
war despite its lack of protection for the crew and fuel tank and the minimal
rear defensive armament of a single 7.7 mm popgun. After 1943, increasing
numbers of advanced U.S. fighters made it difficult to survive in a daylight
attack mode. Eventually, staggering losses forced its relegation to second
line duties where its long endurance made it suitable for anti-submarine
and reconnaissance roles. A total of 1,149 Kates were built by three different
manufacturers.
The Val was also designed in 1937, and though flight testing began in
1938, the first qualification aircraft were not delivered to carriers until
1940. Though appearing obsolescent because of its fixed under-carriage,
it was fast, quite nimble, and an excellent dive bombing platform that
sank more Allied warships than any other Axis aircraft. The fixed undercarriage
waspreferred because it was believed that the complexity of a retraction
mechanism would counter any gains in performance due to reduction in drag. Beginning
with the Hawaiian Operation, in which 126 Vals took part and only 15 were
lost, the D3A greatly contributed to Japanese advances in the Pacific and
Indian Oceans. The plane’s maneuverability gave it a good chance to survive
against early war fighters. The Val suffered from a lack of pilot armor
and self-sealing fuel tanks which made it vulnerable to U.S.N. Grummans
in an unescorted attack. As long as an heavy escort could be provided,
it performed flawlessly. The D3A 2 was introduced after 1942 but the changes
were mostly cosmetic and its survivability was not improved.
At the end of the war a shortage of aluminum caused Aichi to design
a wooden Val with some slight dimensional changes to accommodate the new
material, however only a few were completed before the end of hostilities.
By 1943, a more advanced design, the Yokosuka D4Y Judy began replacing
D3A’s in depleted carrier squadrons and the Val was demoted to land based
units and small carriers that had inadequate deck space to handle the
higher landing speed of the Judy. A total of 1,495 Vals were produced,
mostly by Aichi.The D4Y Judy was very fast for a bomber, over 300 mph,
and carried its bomb load internally which
gave it clean lines that somewhat resembled the Heinkel He118, on which
the design was based. Unlike the German plane however, the D4Y did not
have crew or fuel tank protection. After the Battle of the Philippine Sea
in June 1944, in which 174 D4Y’s achieved little success due, more to unskilled
aircrew, protection flaws and superior U.S. fighter direction, the Judy
was used for high speed reconnaissance and as a night fighter. There was
even a single seat version developed solely for Kamikaze attacks. It was
a worthy successor to the D3A but came at a time in the war when Japanese
aviation was largely inferior to the Allies.
The follow on to the Kate was the Nakajima B6N Jill. Like
the Judy, it was faster than the B5N and even included a
ventral machine gun as in the TBF Avenger. Unfortu-nately, it underwent
over two years of development problems although the prototype was ready
prior to the Pearl Harbor attack. By the time it was introduced to the
fleet, there were few experienced pilots to fly it and fewer carriers
to operate from, thus it came into service primarily as a shore based
aircraft and was particularly aggressive during the Okinawa campaign
both in the conventional attack and Kamikaze roles. As late in the war
as it was introduced,
it still did not have self sealing fuel tanks. They tried this modification
during testing but found that it resulted in a 30% reduction in fuel
capacity, so it was discarded and an expected higher loss rate was accepted.
In service, the B6N performed well but its high wing loading and landing
speed restricted its use to the largest carriers and land bases. The
overwhelming U.S. air superiority and the poor quality of Japanese pilots
negated any technical or performance advances by the Japanese aircraft
industry. To most Americans, the Kate and Val personify Japanese carrier
aviation strike forces. They operated when Japan was on the offensive
and had intact carrier fleets and quality pilots. Their replacements,
however advanced technically, fought at a time when Japanese carriers
were in sharp decline and U.S. fighter strength was at its zenith of
both aircraft and pilot quality. Their accomplishments suffered accordingly
and they are much less well known than the Kate and Val.
Return to Articles
|